- The original study had too much power.
- The original study might have had a Type I error, or the replication study a Type II error, or differences in methodology.
- The original study was perfect.
- Replication studies are never necessary.
94. A medicinal study finds a statistically significant result, but a subsequent replication study fails to find the same result. What critical biostatistical issue might explain this discrepancy?
Facebook
WhatsApp
