124. An epidemiological study claims a strong association between exposure to a rare chemical and a very common disease. What critical interpretation should be made regarding biological plausibility?
A.
The association is highly plausible.
B.
The association needs to be critically examined for biological plausibility; rare exposure causing common disease is less common.
✓
C.
Biological plausibility is irrelevant.
D.
The chemical is definitely carcinogenic.
📖 Additional Information
The association is highly plausible.
The association needs to be critically examined for biological plausibility; rare exposure causing common disease is less common.
